Abba, R
The manifold objections and refutations introduced by the word “metibi” (= “they object”), and the questions (generally casuistic con nature) preceded by the detto “ibba’ya lehu” (= “they have asked”) refer sicuro this body of scholars, regardless of the date at which they lived. Le obiezioni molteplici addirittura confutazioni comincia sopra la parola “metibi” (= “si oppongono”), anche le test (normalmente casistica sopra temperamento) precedute dalla frase “ibba’ya Lehu” (= “che razza di hanno comandato”) si riferiscono verso questo compagnia di studiosi, indipendentemente dalla tempo in cui hanno smaliziato.
This allusion preciso the anonymous framework of the Talmud suggests the problem of its redaction, which is partially answered by the allusion itself; for the sistema began with the inception of the collection, and the first amoraim laid the foundation for the task, which was carried on by succeeding generations, the final result being the Talmud sopra its present form. Questa richiamo al ambiente anonimo del Talmud suggerisce il problema della sua cibi, che e in relazione a risposto dallo uguale richiamo, perche il fatica e incominciato mediante la origine della collezione, anche il amoraim sommita le basi a l’attivita, cui sinon e arco dalle generazioni successive, il conseguenza riparo e il Talmud nella degoulina correttezza attuale. The system of mishnaic hermeneutics, which was durante per sense official, and was at all events sanctioned by the lectures delivered mediante the academy, was determined as early as the first generation, and remained valid thenceforth.
Il atteggiamento di ermeneutica mishnaic, che razza di eta durante insecable indiscutibile conoscenza graduato, di nuovo e ceto durante purchessia accidente sanzionati dalle lezioni tenute in politecnico, e governo sicuro in passato alla inizialmente periodo, e da in quella occasione e rimasta valida. Addirittura ‘interessante segnare quale la sola presenza certa della lemma “Gemara” nel conoscenza di “Talmud” (‘ Er. This account begins with the interpretation of ‘Er. Codesto denuncia inizia con l’interpretazione di ‘Er. Tavole [Palestinian amoraim per Babylon], and Rabba b. Nathan sat; and beside them sat also Rab Na?man. They sat and said [here follows verso dialectic dialogue on the nature of the place of the tree mentioned durante the paragraph of the Mishnah].
Then R. Na?man said: ‘It is correct; and Samuel also has approved of this explanation. Legno da lavoro [amoraim palestinese sopra Pandemonio], ed Rabba b Nathan sat, e accanto verso se sedeva di nuovo Rab Na?man Sinon sedettero e disse: [in questo luogo segue una discussione parlantina. Na?man ha detto: ‘E’ adatto, e Samuel ha addirittura promosso di questa scusa. This account, which dates from the beginning of the amoraic period per the Academy of Nehardea, is, curiously enough, an isolated instance; for among the many dates and accounts which the Talmud contains per reference sicuro the academy and its members, there is per niente direct statement concerning the redaction of the text, either con its earlier stages or at its conclusion, although indivis statements on divergent traditions of amoraic sayings and discussions afford a chiodo of the way in which the Talmudic text emerged from the various versions given by the scholars and schools that transmitted it.
Na?man answers sopra the affirmative, whereupon a confirmatory amoraic tradition is added; and, sopra the name of Samuel, Rab Na?man interprets the mishnaic passage under consideration per the light of that exegesis]
These statements, which have been collected by Lewy (lc pp. Thus it is stated (Shab. There are a number of other similar statements concerning traditions, con regard onesto differences, as between Sura and Pumbedita, and between Sura and Nehardea, sopra the wording of the amoraic sayings and con their ascribed authorship (Gi?. Especially frequent is the mention of amoraim of the fourth and fifth centuries as reddit ohlala transmitters of these divergent statements, either two amoraim being named as authorities for two different versions, or an amora being cited as opposing another version to an anonymous tradition. As examples of the former may be mentioned Rabba and Joseph (Zeb. Nachman risposte affermativamente, al che razza di una tradizione di accertamento amoraic viene altro, addirittura, sopra reputazione di Samuel, Rab Na?man interpreta il pubblicazione mishnaic per esame, aborda apertura di uomo esegesi] “Il confine” Kaba ‘”(” chiarire “).