89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = 2.97), both groups different ranging from half a year and you can eleven years of dating; seven.76 (SD = cuatro.01), anywhere between several and you may 19 years; and (SD = 4.82), between below a year and you will 31 age. 8%) and you can stayed with family relations, if you are the individuals living with the couples was indeed mostly functioning anyone (69.2%), from which 53% got college otherwise postgraduate amounts. Of specialized relationship users, 67% got school or article-scholar levels, where 89.8% was basically working, 2% retired and 8.2% out of work. The working condition to the married professionals are comparable: 89.5% was performing, dos.9% was resigned and you may six.3% was in fact unemployed, and you can step one.3% known some other a career position. Contained in this group, 62.5% of your own members got university or postgraduate stages.
Matchmaking Quality, chosen to confirm conditions validity, is measured into the Relationship Get Means–Changed (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt
The info exhibited are amassed inside the perspective of broader search tactics, and this consisted of a detailed sociodemographic and you can relationship assessment, along with other balances in the range away from intimate dating.
Individual relationship was analyzed with regards to the Portuguese adaptation (Table step one) of smaller sort of the fresh new Work Level (Stanley, 1986), which was translated with respect to the adopting the translation and you can retroversion measures: once permission was given of the writer, the first size try translated because of the two experts in the field, both of these translations was in fact subjected to retroversion from the several benefits, you to bilingual and another proficient in the usage new English language; in the long run, for each variation is actually compared to the amazing level, choosing the usage of the fresh terms and you will activities with higher proximity to they. The newest Portuguese type hence contains the newest fourteen fresh points and an equivalent answer level and you will is named, after deliberation by the group, the personal Connection Scale (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). With the last stage of translation procedure, the fresh new means try applied to 3 members on the aim of verifying the fresh adequateness of code together with unambiguous understanding of things, that happen to be talked about on the players immediately following application of the survey. Because there had been no comments saying if not, things remained an identical.
According to the total time of the relationship, the typical, in many years, to your various other statuses demonstrated is, respectively: dos
by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.