Hipotesis Del Aborto Legal En Mexico

Ortiz Millán, G. (2009). La moralité de l`abortion, Mexico, éditions Siglo XXI, 129 p. The main obstacle that seems to stand in the way ± the design of a law on time limits that places the decision and responsibility for abortion in the hands of women is the doctrine established by the Constitutional Court on the protection of the unborn child. How can the woman`s free choice to terminate her pregnancy be linked to the protection of this legal interest, and not of a person who is the foetus, as expressly stated by the Constitutional Court? Since the State is responsible for providing women with appropriate advice and informing them about the amount of family, economic and social assistance available in order to freely weigh their decision in full knowledge of the facts, it is the solution that the Federal Constitutional Court divorced at the time that serves as a guideline for the Government`s project. OF the THREE hypotheses considered in recent years to improve ±of the law on abortion – leave it as it perfects its health application, extend it with a new legal hypothesis for socio-economic reasons or modify it substantially with the introduction of a system of duration that allows a free termination of pregnancy during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy-, The government has opted for the latter. With good judgment. All other options would have left things as they were, i.e. the decision to abort in the hands of judges and doctors©, rather than in the hands of the pregnant woman responsibly determined to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. But beyond that, this option is no more politically risky for the government than the others: sectors that oppose abortion make no distinction; They reject with equal insistence©any legal formula, however timid, that they recognize. And socially, the solution chosen is the one that best corresponds to the majority feeling of the population: regardless of the different philosophical and political approaches to abortion, the majority of citizens are against their approach in criminal terms, and especially against those who bet on the prosecution of women who decide to terminate their pregnancies as© criminals. Faundes, A., & Barzelatto, J.

(2011). The drama of abortion. In search of consensus, Buenos Aires, Paidós, 272 p. Cano, Gabriela, (s/a), “Una perspectiva del aborto en los años treinta: la propuesta marxista”, Memoria, pp. 371-381, www.debatefeminista.cieg.unam.mx/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/articulos/002_32.pdf This study attempts to legally debate the decriminalization of abortion at the beginning of the twenty-first century. With particular emphasis on the phenomenon that landed in the Mexican case, the points of view are opposed and for, the actors influencing each of the positions, a comparison of the legal situation in the American countries, the current legal status in Mexico and finally the weighting between human rights in relation to the specific case of this problem. The approach is carried out using a comparative method and the research deals with the description. Two antagonistic positions are noted: the defense of the right of women to decide on their own bodies on the basis of the legal reason of international human rights law and, on the other hand, the conception of the defense of life on the basis of the moral and religious commandments of the Catholic faith. H.

Tribe, L. (2012). El aborto: guerra de absolutas, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Penales, 603 p. The obligation assumed by the State is certainly delicate. Counselling for women – conducted in public or private health centres licensed for abortion – cannot be one of them. Conditioning of their will, yet another simple bureaucratic process without content. This means that it must be effective and at the same time exercised according to specifically informative criteria and with the strictest scientific and ideological neutrality. It would be truly disturbing if a rule that puts the always traumatic abortion decision in the hands of women were to have loopholes that would allow strangers to further manipulate their will. No one breaks up for fun. Federal Penal Code (2018), Penal Code www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/9_051118.pdf of the State of Chihuahua, (2018), www.congresochihuahua2.gob.mx/biblioteca/codigos/archivosCodigos/64.pdf. Castañeda Salgado, M.

P. (coord.) (2003). Abortion. Reflexiones teóricas, filosóficas y políticas, Mexico, Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades, UNAM, Plaza y Valdés, 258 p. Faria, N. (2004). Reproductive rights in the context of globalization, in García Adela, (ed.) Gender and Citizenship, Barcelona, Icaria editorial, 103 p. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, (1994), www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/event-pdf/icpd_spa_2.pdf time: eighth epoch, file: 219540, instance: circuit collegiate courts, art of thesis: isolated, Source: Judicial Weekly of the Federation, Volume IX, April 1992, Subject(s): criminal, thesis: isolated (criminal), page: 398. Medical Dictionary, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, www.cun.es/diccionario-medico. Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, (2019), www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/1_260319.pdf Smok, Gabriela; Roa, Ignacio; Prieto, Ruth; Rojas, Mariana.

“Transiting from Embryo to Fetus: The Metamorphosis of Chordés,” Int. J. Morphol., 36(2): 709-715, 2018. He holds a bachelor`s degree in political science from the Iztapalpa Autonomous Metropolitan Region and is currently pursuing a master`s degree in legal research at the Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, (2015), www.un.org/es/documents/udhr/UDHR_booklet_SP_web.pdf Supreme Court of the Nation, “Ponderación entre derechos fundamentales”, 15 p. www.scjn.gob.mx/sites/default/files/transparencia/documentos/becarios/195carmen-vergara-lopez.pdf Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas 2018-2030. Call to Action for Health and Well-being in the Region (2017), iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/49169/CSP296-spa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Copyright in the contents of the journal Specialized in Legal Research is held by the Authors` Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1981), cedoc.inmujeres.gob.mx/documentos_download/100039.pdf.

Dieser Beitrag wurde unter Allgemein veröffentlicht. Setze ein Lesezeichen auf den Permalink.